위험성평가 절차6(Risk assessment process)

위험성평가 절차6(Risk assessment process)

 Here's an example table of contents for the risk assessment process:

I. Introduction
A. Purpose of Risk Assessment
B. Scope of Risk Assessment
C. Definitions
D. Roles and Responsibilities

II. Hazard Identification
A. Sources of Hazards
B. Types of Hazards
C. Hazard Recognition
D. Hazard Assessment Tools

III. Risk Analysis
A. Risk Assessment Methods
B. Risk Rating Criteria
C. Severity and Probability
D. Risk Evaluation

IV. Risk Controls
A. Hierarchy of Controls
B. Engineering Controls
C. Administrative Controls
D. Personal Protective Equipment

V. Implementation
A. Action Plan
B. Responsibility and Accountability
C. Timeline
D. Resources

VI. Monitoring and Review
A. Performance Indicators
B. Review Frequency
C. Corrective Actions
D. Continuous Improvement

VII. Documentation
A. Risk Assessment Report
B. Record Keeping
C. Confidentiality and Access

VIII. Communication and Training
A. Communication Plan
B. Training Program
C. Feedback Mechanisms

IX. Conclusion
A. Summary of Findings
B. Lessons Learned
C. Recommendations
D. Future Considerations

 

 

다음은 위험 평가 프로세스의 목차 예시입니다.

I. 소개
가. 위해성 평가의 목적
나. 위해성 평가의 범위
C. 정의
D. 역할 및 책임

II. 위험 식별
A. 위험의 원인
나. 위험의 종류
C. 위험 인식
D. 위험 평가 도구

III. 위험도 분석
A. 위험 평가 방법
B. 위험 등급 기준
C. 심각도 및 가능성
D. 위험성 평가

IV. 위험 통제
A. 제어 계층
B. 공학적 통제
C. 행정 통제
D. 개인 보호 장비

V. 이행
가. 실행 계획
나. 책임과 의무
다. 타임라인
D. 자원

VI. 모니터링 및 검토
가. 성과지표
B. 검토 빈도
다. 시정 조치
D. 지속적인 개선

VII. 선적 서류 비치
A. 위험성 평가 보고서
나. 기록 보관
C. 기밀성 및 접근

VIII. 커뮤니케이션 및 교육
가. 커뮤니케이션 계획
나. 교육 프로그램
C. 피드백 메커니즘

IX. 결론
A. 결과 요약
B. 배운 교훈
다. 권고사항
D. 향후 고려 사항

 

VI. Monitoring and Review

 

Monitoring and review is a critical stage of the risk assessment process. It involves regularly reviewing and monitoring the effectiveness of the risk control measures that have been implemented, and making any necessary adjustments to ensure that the risks are effectively managed.

The monitoring and review process typically involves the following steps:

1. Establishing performance indicators: It is important to establish clear and measurable performance indicators to monitor the effectiveness of the risk control measures. This may include metrics such as the number of incidents or accidents, the severity of incidents, and the frequency of safety inspections.
2. Conducting regular inspections and audits: Regular inspections and audits can help to identify any potential risks or hazards that may have been missed during the initial risk assessment, as well as to ensure that the risk control measures are being effectively implemented.
3. Analyzing data: Analyzing the data collected through inspections, audits, and incident reports can help to identify patterns or trends that may indicate potential risks, as well as to determine whether the risk control measures are effectively mitigating the identified risks.
4. Reviewing and updating risk assessments: As new risks are identified or as existing risks change, it may be necessary to review and update the risk assessment to ensure that it remains accurate and up-to-date.
5. Communicating results: Communicating the results of the monitoring and review process to all stakeholders is important to ensure that everyone is aware of any changes to the risk assessment or to the risk control measures.

The monitoring and review process should be ongoing, with regular reviews and updates to ensure that the risks are effectively managed over time. By regularly reviewing and monitoring the effectiveness of the risk control measures, organizations can ensure that they are effectively managing their risks and maintaining a safe and healthy work environment.

 

VI. 모니터링 및 검토

 

모니터링 및 검토는 위험 평가 프로세스의 중요한 단계입니다. 여기에는 구현된 위험 통제 조치의 효과를 정기적으로 검토 및 모니터링하고 위험이 효과적으로 관리되도록 필요한 조정이 포함됩니다.

모니터링 및 검토 프로세스에는 일반적으로 다음 단계가 포함됩니다.

성과 지표 설정: 위험 통제 조치의 효과를 모니터링하기 위해 명확하고 측정 가능한 성과 지표를 설정하는 것이 중요합니다. 여기에는 사건이나 사고의 수, 사건의 심각성, 안전 검사 빈도와 같은 지표가 포함될 수 있습니다.

정기적인 검사 및 감사 실시: 정기적인 검사 및 감사는 초기 위험 평가 중에 놓쳤을 수 있는 잠재적인 위험 또는 위험을 식별하고 위험 통제 조치가 효과적으로 구현되고 있는지 확인하는 데 도움이 될 수 있습니다.

데이터 분석: 검사, 감사 및 사고 보고서를 통해 수집된 데이터를 분석하면 잠재적인 위험을 나타낼 수 있는 패턴이나 추세를 식별하고 위험 제어 조치가 식별된 위험을 효과적으로 완화하는지 여부를 판단하는 데 도움이 될 수 있습니다.

위험 평가 검토 및 업데이트: 새로운 위험이 식별되거나 기존 위험이 변경되면 정확하고 최신 상태로 유지되도록 위험 평가를 검토하고 업데이트해야 할 수 있습니다.

결과 전달: 모니터링 및 검토 프로세스의 결과를 모든 이해 관계자에게 전달하는 것은 모든 사람이 위험 평가 또는 위험 통제 조치에 대한 변경 사항을 인식하도록 하는 데 중요합니다.

시간이 지남에 따라 위험이 효과적으로 관리되도록 정기적인 검토 및 업데이트와 함께 모니터링 및 검토 프로세스가 진행되어야 합니다. 위험 통제 조치의 효과를 정기적으로 검토하고 모니터링함으로써 조직은 위험을 효과적으로 관리하고 안전하고 건강한 작업 환경을 유지하고 있는지 확인할 수 있습니다.

 

A. Performance Indicators

 

Performance indicators are measurable parameters that are used to assess the effectiveness of risk control measures implemented in response to identified risks. They help to track progress and identify areas for improvement in risk management.

Performance indicators can be quantitative or qualitative, and may vary depending on the specific nature of the risks being managed. Some examples of performance indicators include:

1. Incident rates: These are measures of the frequency and severity of incidents or accidents related to the identified risks. Incident rates can help to identify trends and patterns, and track progress in reducing the number and severity of incidents.
2. Compliance rates: These are measures of the extent to which policies and procedures related to risk control measures are being followed. Compliance rates can help to identify areas where additional training or support may be needed.
3. Employee engagement: This is a qualitative measure of employee perceptions of the effectiveness of risk control measures. Employee engagement surveys can help to identify areas where employees may have concerns or suggestions for improving risk management.
4. Audit results: These are measures of the effectiveness of risk control measures as determined by internal or external audits. Audit results can help to identify areas for improvement and ensure that the risk control measures are being effectively implemented.
5. Near-miss reporting: These are measures of the number of near-misses related to the identified risks that have been reported. Near-miss reporting can help to identify potential risks before they result in an actual incident or accident.

Performance indicators should be selected based on the specific risks being managed and the objectives of the risk assessment. They should be regularly reviewed and updated as needed to ensure that they remain relevant and effective in assessing risk management performance.

 

가. 성과지표

 

성능 지표는 식별된 위험에 대응하여 구현된 위험 통제 조치의 효율성을 평가하는 데 사용되는 측정 가능한 매개변수입니다. 진행 상황을 추적하고 위험 관리 개선 영역을 식별하는 데 도움이 됩니다.

성과 지표는 정량적이거나 정성적일 수 있으며 관리되는 위험의 특정 특성에 따라 달라질 수 있습니다. 성과 지표의 몇 가지 예는 다음과 같습니다.

사고율: 식별된 위험과 관련된 사건 또는 사고의 빈도 및 심각도를 측정한 것입니다. 사고율은 추세와 패턴을 식별하고 사고의 수와 심각도를 줄이는 과정을 추적하는 데 도움이 될 수 있습니다.

준수율: 이는 위험 통제 조치와 관련된 정책 및 절차가 준수되고 있는 정도를 측정한 것입니다. 준수율은 추가 교육 또는 지원이 필요할 수 있는 영역을 식별하는 데 도움이 될 수 있습니다.

직원 참여: 이것은 위험 통제 조치의 효과에 대한 직원 인식의 질적 측정입니다. 직원 참여 설문조사는 직원이 위험 관리 개선을 위해 우려하거나 제안할 수 있는 영역을 식별하는 데 도움이 될 수 있습니다.

감사 결과: 내부 또는 외부 감사에 의해 결정된 위험 통제 조치의 효율성 측정입니다. 감사 결과는 개선이 필요한 영역을 식별하고 위험 통제 조치가 효과적으로 구현되고 있는지 확인하는 데 도움이 될 수 있습니다.

아차 사고 보고: 보고된 식별된 위험과 관련된 아차 사고 수를 측정한 것입니다. 아차 사고 보고는 실제 사건이나 사고로 이어지기 전에 잠재적인 위험을 식별하는 데 도움이 될 수 있습니다.

성과 지표는 관리 중인 특정 위험과 위험 평가의 목표를 기반으로 선택해야 합니다. 위험 관리 성과를 평가하는 데 적절하고 효과적인지 확인하기 위해 정기적으로 검토하고 필요에 따라 업데이트해야 합니다.

 

B. Review Frequency

 

The review frequency for risk assessment depends on several factors, including the nature and complexity of the risks being managed, the level of uncertainty or change in the environment, and the availability of resources for monitoring and review.

In general, risk assessments should be reviewed and updated at least annually or whenever there are significant changes to the work environment or work processes. This can help to ensure that the risk assessment remains accurate and up-to-date, and that any new risks are identified and managed appropriately.

However, some risks may require more frequent monitoring and review. For example, risks related to hazardous materials or equipment may require daily or weekly inspections, while risks related to ergonomic factors may only require quarterly or bi-annual reviews.

It is important to establish a review frequency that is appropriate for the specific risks being managed and to allocate the necessary resources to ensure that the monitoring and review process is effectively carried out. Regular monitoring and review can help to ensure that risks are effectively managed and that the risk control measures remain effective over time.

 

B. 검토 빈도

 

위험 평가를 위한 검토 빈도는 관리 중인 위험의 특성과 복잡성, 환경의 불확실성 또는 변화 수준, 모니터링 및 검토를 위한 리소스의 가용성을 비롯한 여러 요인에 따라 달라집니다.

일반적으로 위험 평가는 적어도 매년 또는 작업 환경이나 작업 프로세스에 상당한 변화가 있을 때마다 검토하고 업데이트해야 합니다. 이렇게 하면 위험 평가가 정확하고 최신 상태로 유지되고 새로운 위험이 식별되고 적절하게 관리되는 데 도움이 될 수 있습니다.

그러나 일부 위험은 더 자주 모니터링하고 검토해야 할 수 있습니다. 예를 들어 유해 물질이나 장비와 관련된 위험은 매일 또는 매주 검사가 필요할 수 있지만 인체 공학적 요소와 관련된 위험은 분기별 또는 연 2회 검토만 필요할 수 있습니다.

관리 중인 특정 위험에 적합한 검토 빈도를 설정하고 모니터링 및 검토 프로세스가 효과적으로 수행되도록 필요한 리소스를 할당하는 것이 중요합니다. 정기적인 모니터링 및 검토는 위험이 효과적으로 관리되고 위험 통제 조치가 시간이 지나도 효과를 유지하도록 하는 데 도움이 될 수 있습니다.

 

C. Corrective Actions

 

Corrective actions are measures taken to address identified risks that require immediate or ongoing attention. Corrective actions are typically implemented after the risk assessment has been completed and risks have been identified and evaluated.

Corrective actions can take many forms, depending on the nature of the risk and the risk control measures that are required. Some examples of corrective actions include:

1. Engineering controls: This may involve modifying equipment or facilities to reduce risks or hazards.
2. Administrative controls: This may involve changing policies or procedures to improve safety or reduce risks.
3. Personal protective equipment (PPE): This may involve providing employees with appropriate PPE to reduce their exposure to hazards.
4. Training and education: This may involve providing employees with training and education to improve their understanding of risks and how to manage them effectively.
5. Incident investigation and analysis: This may involve investigating incidents or accidents to identify the root causes and implementing corrective actions to prevent them from happening again.

Corrective actions should be implemented as soon as possible after risks have been identified and evaluated. It is important to allocate the necessary resources to ensure that corrective actions are effectively implemented and to regularly monitor and review their effectiveness to ensure that they are achieving the desired outcomes.

 

다. 시정 조치

 

시정 조치는 즉각적이거나 지속적인 주의가 필요한 식별된 위험을 해결하기 위해 취하는 조치입니다. 시정 조치는 일반적으로 위험 평가가 완료되고 위험이 식별 및 평가된 후에 구현됩니다.

시정 조치는 위험의 특성과 필요한 위험 통제 조치에 따라 다양한 형태를 취할 수 있습니다. 시정 조치의 몇 가지 예는 다음과 같습니다.

공학적 통제: 여기에는 위험이나 위험을 줄이기 위해 장비나 시설을 수정하는 것이 포함될 수 있습니다.

관리 통제: 여기에는 안전을 개선하거나 위험을 줄이기 위해 정책 또는 절차를 변경하는 것이 포함될 수 있습니다.

개인 보호 장비(PPE): 여기에는 위험에 대한 노출을 줄이기 위해 직원에게 적절한 PPE를 제공하는 것이 포함될 수 있습니다.

훈련 및 교육: 여기에는 위험에 대한 이해와 이를 효과적으로 관리하는 방법을 개선하기 위해 직원에게 훈련 및 교육을 제공하는 것이 포함될 수 있습니다.

사건 조사 및 분석: 여기에는 근본 원인을 식별하기 위해 사건 또는 사고를 조사하고 다시 발생하지 않도록 시정 조치를 구현하는 것이 포함될 수 있습니다.

시정 조치는 위험이 식별되고 평가된 후 가능한 한 빨리 구현되어야 합니다. 시정 조치가 효과적으로 구현되도록 필요한 자원을 할당하고 그 효과를 정기적으로 모니터링 및 검토하여 원하는 결과를 달성하고 있는지 확인하는 것이 중요합니다.

 

D. Continuous Improvement

 

Continuous improvement is an ongoing process of monitoring, evaluating, and updating risk assessment and management processes to ensure that they remain effective over time. This involves regularly reviewing and analyzing risk assessments and risk management plans, identifying areas for improvement, and implementing changes to improve the effectiveness of risk management strategies.

Continuous improvement is important in risk assessment because risks and work environments can change over time, and new risks may emerge that were not previously identified. Continuous improvement helps to ensure that risk management processes remain up-to-date and effective in managing the changing risks.

Some steps in the continuous improvement process may include:

1. Regularly reviewing risk assessments to identify any changes or new risks that need to be addressed.
2. Evaluating the effectiveness of existing risk management strategies and identifying areas for improvement.
3. Implementing new or updated risk management strategies based on the results of the evaluation.
4. Monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of the new or updated strategies.
5. Adjusting risk management strategies as needed based on ongoing monitoring and review.

Continuous improvement is an important aspect of risk assessment because it helps to ensure that risks are effectively managed over time, and that risk management strategies remain up-to-date and relevant to the changing work environment.

 

D. 지속적인 개선

 

지속적인 개선은 위험 평가 및 관리 프로세스를 모니터링, 평가 및 업데이트하여 시간이 지나도 효과를 유지하도록 하는 지속적인 프로세스입니다. 여기에는 위험 평가 및 위험 관리 계획을 정기적으로 검토 및 분석하고, 개선 영역을 식별하고, 위험 관리 전략의 효율성을 개선하기 위한 변경 사항을 구현하는 작업이 포함됩니다.

위험 및 작업 환경은 시간이 지남에 따라 변할 수 있고 이전에 식별되지 않은 새로운 위험이 나타날 수 있기 때문에 위험 평가에서 지속적인 개선이 중요합니다. 지속적인 개선을 통해 위험 관리 프로세스를 최신 상태로 유지하고 변화하는 위험을 효과적으로 관리할 수 있습니다.

지속적인 개선 프로세스의 일부 단계에는 다음이 포함될 수 있습니다.

위험 평가를 정기적으로 검토하여 해결해야 할 변경 사항이나 새로운 위험을 식별합니다.

기존 위험 관리 전략의 효과를 평가하고 개선 영역을 식별합니다.

평가 결과에 따라 신규 또는 업데이트된 위험 관리 전략을 구현합니다.

새롭거나 업데이트된 전략의 효과를 모니터링하고 검토합니다.

지속적인 모니터링 및 검토를 기반으로 필요에 따라 위험 관리 전략을 조정합니다.

지속적인 개선은 시간이 지남에 따라 위험을 효과적으로 관리하고 위험 관리 전략을 최신 상태로 유지하고 변화하는 작업 환경과 관련되도록 하기 때문에 위험 평가의 중요한 측면입니다.

 

 

 

Copyright 2020. (lifelinekeeper) all rights reserved.